Loading

Testing & Laboratory

Battery Testing

With its subgroups, experiments and associated standards.

Request a Quote

Levels

Performans

Abuse

Environmental and Mechanical

Other

Battery Testing — What Does This Testing Field Cover?

The section below describes how the field of Battery Testing works. The conditions, sample requirements and acceptance criteria of the individual tests in this field are given on the relevant test pages.

Battery testing answers three separate questions, each with its own body of standards: can the battery be transported, is it safe in use, does it deliver the declared performance? These three questions are often confused with one another, and the confusion has commercial consequences — a market cannot be entered with a transport report, and a shipment cannot be made with a product safety report.

On the transport side, UN 38.3 is a mandatory gate; a battery without that evidence cannot be shipped. On the safety side the application determines what applies: IEC 62133-2 for portable products, IEC 62619 and IEC 63056 for industrial and energy storage applications, UNECE R100, UL 2580 and ISO 6469 for electric vehicles. On the performance side, capacity, internal resistance, cycle life, self-discharge, charge acceptance and temperature-dependent behaviour are measured.

The distinction of LEVEL is essential in this family and is the subject that causes the most argument in the supply chain. Cell, module and pack are assessed separately; a certificate obtained for a cell does not demonstrate the conformity of the pack. Alongside the cells, the behaviour of the pack is determined by the battery management system, the cooling design, the mechanical structure, the interconnection arrangement and insulation coordination. Putting the cell supplier's report into the pack file is a common but inadequate approach.

Thermal runaway and its propagation are the most critical subject in the field. A lithium cell may enter a self-sustaining chemical reaction when damaged or overheated; at that point removing the heat from outside is usually not possible. Modern standards therefore treat thermal runaway of a single cell as an UNAVOIDABLE fault scenario and change the question: does the event propagate to neighbouring cells, what does it release outside the pack, and how much time is left for the user to escape?

In this field the battery management system is assessed not as an electronic board but as a SAFETY FUNCTION. It is shown that overcharge, overdischarge, overcurrent and overtemperature protections actually operate, that the system falls to the safe side in a fault, and that its software has been verified. In industrial and vehicle applications this assessment is tied to functional safety frameworks.

The regulatory side is becoming rapidly more demanding. Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 goes beyond safety and introduces obligations for carbon footprint declaration, recovered content ratio, durability and capacity declaration, the battery passport, and removability for portable batteries. This takes the scope of testing beyond classical safety tests.

Method groups in this field

  • Electrical abuse

    Overcharge, overdischarge, external short circuit, forced discharge and unbalanced charging. This is where it is seen whether the protection circuits actually work.

  • Mechanical abuse

    Vibration, shock, crush, penetration, free fall and tipping. It is monitored whether internal short circuit conditions arise.

  • Thermal tests

    Temperature cycling, thermal shock, high temperature storage, fire exposure and thermal runaway propagation.

  • Environmental tests

    Humidity, low pressure, salt spray and, where required, immersion; these come to the fore in vehicle and outdoor applications.

  • Performance measurements

    Capacity, energy and power, internal resistance, efficiency, cycle life, calendar life and temperature-dependent behaviour.

  • BMS verification

    Verification of protection thresholds, the cell balancing function, communications and fault response.

Commonly confused in this field

  • UN 38.3 is not a product safety certificate; it only demonstrates transport conformity.
  • A cell certificate does not demonstrate pack conformity. The pack is assessed separately with its own architecture.
  • Two packs built from the same cell give different results; cooling, interconnection and mechanical structure are decisive.
  • A performance test is not a safety test. A cycle life report does not satisfy safety requirements.
  • For an electric vehicle battery, a UL 2580 report and UNECE R100 approval are not the same thing; one is a standards assessment, the other a type approval regime.
  • A vehicle battery moved into a second-life application enters a new usage profile; the earlier assessment does not carry over directly.

Which decisions these results support

  • Transport conformity and the test summary for shipment
  • Product safety declaration and market access
  • Performance, durability and carbon footprint declarations under the Battery Regulation
  • Assessing the impact of a cell supplier or BMS change
  • Site acceptance processes for an energy storage system

Related standards

UN 38.3IEC 62133IEC 62619IEC 62620UL 1642UL 2054UL 2580ISO 12405UNECE R100

Sectors

In which sectors is Battery Testing used?

Battery Testing quote

Tell us your product and the applicable standard; we'll share the timeline and sample requirements in writing.

Request a Quote

We use cookies required for the site to work. With your permission we also add an analytics cookie to understand how pages are used. Cookie Policy