What Is Usability IEC 62366?
IEC 62366-1 assessment verifies that a usability engineering process has been applied to manage the risks arising from use errors of the medical device. The standard's basic approach is: a use error is not the user's fault but an outcome of the design, and must be prevented through design.
Purpose of Usability IEC 62366
The purpose is to show that the device can be used safely by the intended user, in the intended use environment and use scenarios, and that use-error risk has been reduced to an acceptable level.
Which Products Is Usability IEC 62366 Applied To?
- Infusion pumps and injection devices
- Home-use medical devices (blood-pressure monitor, glucometer)
- Patient monitors and alarm systems
- Surgical devices and user interfaces
- Medical device software interfaces
In Which Sectors Is Usability IEC 62366 Used?
Standards Related to Usability IEC 62366
- IEC 62366-1usability engineering in medical devices test
- IEC 62366-2
- ISO 14971
- IEC 60601-1-6
- ISO 13485medical device quality management system test
- ISO 11607end product sterile barrier packaging test
Usability IEC 62366 Conditions
- Use specification
- The target user group, use environment and use scenarios are defined
- Critical tasks
- Tasks that, if performed incorrectly, could lead to harm are identified
- Validation
- Carried out with representative users, under realistic use conditions
Equipment for Usability IEC 62366
- Usability test laboratory or simulated use environment
- Video and screen recording system
- Observation and data-collection tools
- Participant-management infrastructure
Sample Requirements for Usability IEC 62366
- The final, or equivalent-to-final, device and user interface
- Use specification and user-interface specification
- Risk management file and use-error analysis
- Instructions for use and training materials
- Access to a representative user group must be provided
Duration of Usability IEC 62366
Formative evaluations continue throughout development; the summative validation study takes several weeks, including planning and participant recruitment.
Usability IEC 62366 Procedure
- 1The use specification is prepared: user, environment, scenarios.
- 2Safety-related user-interface characteristics are identified.
- 3Known and foreseeable use errors are analysed.
- 4Critical tasks are defined.
- 5The user-interface specification and evaluation plan are prepared.
- 6The design is refined through formative evaluations.
- 7The summative validation study is conducted with representative users.
- 8Use errors and difficulties are analysed with their root causes.
Usability IEC 62366 Acceptance Criteria
The acceptance criterion is that, in summative validation, no use error remains on critical tasks that leads to unacceptable risk. Every observed use error and difficulty is assessed through root-cause analysis; risk acceptability is determined under ISO 14971.
Evaluation of Results
In the assessment, the nature of the error is decisive, not its count. A use error observed in a single participant but capable of causing serious harm is a more severe finding than a minor difficulty observed in many participants.
Usability IEC 62366 Report
- Use specification and user profile
- Critical-task list and rationale
- Evaluation plan and participant information
- Observed use errors and difficulties
- Root-cause analyses
- Risk assessment and conclusion
Accreditation
EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.
Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.
Scope and authorisationsRelated Regulations
- MDR (EU) 2017/745
- Relationship with IEC 60601-1-6
Medikal Cihaz Testleri — What Does This Testing Field Cover?
The section below describes the field that the Usability IEC 62366 test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.
Medical device testing shows that a device is safe for the patient and the user and maintains its intended performance. In this family safety is not only about avoiding harm; a device failing to perform its expected function is also treated as a risk. A monitor missing an alarm or a pump delivering the wrong dose is directly a patient safety event.
At the centre of the field is RISK MANAGEMENT, and this is what sets medical apart from other sectors. The risk management process run under ISO 14971 also determines which tests are required. The test list is not copied from a table of standards; it is derived and justified from the device's intended use, the nature and duration of patient contact, the use environment and foreseeable misuse.
Assessment consists of several separate bodies of work, each with its own set of standards. Biocompatibility runs through the ISO 10993 series, electrical device safety through the IEC 60601 series, sterilisation through ISO 11135/11137/17665, packaging through ISO 11607, software through IEC 62304 and usability through IEC 62366. The quality system (ISO 13485) is the framework that binds these together.
Which tests are required is determined by the device's CLASS and its MODE OF CONTACT WITH THE BODY. A product in brief contact with skin and an implant entering the bloodstream do not go through the same test set; the scope is set by a biological evaluation plan prepared under ISO 10993-1. That plan justifies in writing which endpoints are required and why the others are not.
Packaging and sterilisation are taken as seriously as the device itself in this field. For a sterile device the packaging is not a transport container but the barrier that maintains sterility; if the barrier is breached, the device is no longer sterile. Packaging processes are therefore validated and shelf life is supported by real-time ageing data.
For devices containing software, assessment shifts from testing towards PROCESS assurance. IEC 62304 defines which development and verification steps must be followed according to the safety class of the software; the evidence is the traceability of the development process. Testing software does not make it safe — the process record does.
The clinical side is a separate column of the technical file. Test reports show that the device is technically safe; clinical evaluation establishes that the device delivers the intended clinical benefit and that the benefit-risk balance is acceptable. Neither replaces the other.
Method groups in this field
Biocompatibility
Cytotoxicity, irritation, skin sensitisation, systemic toxicity, haemocompatibility, genotoxicity and local effects after implantation. The required endpoints are set by the ISO 10993-1 plan.
Electrical device safety
IEC 60601-1 basic safety and essential performance; EMC, alarm, usability and environmental requirements through the collateral standards.
Sterilisation validation
Validation of sterilisation processes by ethylene oxide, radiation or moist heat; bioburden and sterility assurance level studies.
Packaging
Integrity of the sterile barrier system, seal strength, distribution simulation and shelf-life studies.
Microbiological tests
Bioburden determination, sterility testing, bacterial endotoxin and, where required, carrier validation studies.
Software and usability
IEC 62304 life cycle evidence and use-error focused evaluation under IEC 62366.
Commonly confused in this field
- Cytotoxicity alone is not evidence of biocompatibility; the required set of endpoints is determined and justified according to ISO 10993-1.
- An ISO 13485 certificate does not confer CE marking; classification under the MDR, the technical file and the notified body process run separately.
- Accelerated ageing does not replace real-time ageing; a shelf life claim is supported by real-time data.
- A change of material (supplier, pigment, sterilisation method) may require the biological evaluation to be repeated; it is not a silent change.
- An assessment made without the collateral and particular standards for IEC 60601-1 is incomplete; which -1-x and -2-x standards were applied must appear in the report.
- In vitro diagnostic devices fall under the IVDR rather than the MDR, and laboratory equipment is often on the IEC 61010-1 side.
Which decisions these results support
- MDR/IVDR technical file and notified body assessment
- Completing the biological evaluation plan
- Sterilisation and packaging validation
- Determining shelf life and storage conditions
- Determining the scope of reassessment after a design change
Related Tests
Frequently Asked Questions About Usability IEC 62366
How many participants should I validate with?
IEC 62366-1 does not impose a specific number; it requires the number to be justified according to the diversity of the user group. In practice, at least 15 participants per distinct user group is a common approach and aligns with regulatory expectations.
What is the difference between formative and summative evaluation?
Formative evaluation is performed during development to refine the design and is iterative. Summative evaluation is the final validation performed after the design is frozen, to prove that the user interface is suitable for safe use.











