Loading

Climate and Environmental Claims

Climate Claims

Verification statement
A moment from a verification assignment

What Is Verification?

Climate claims verification is the independent examination of the basis and consistency of an organisation's publicly disclosed climate commitments — a net-zero target, interim reduction targets, a climate-neutral statement. Its difference from carbon neutrality is that it mostly assesses a FORWARD-LOOKING commitment.

Why Is It Done?

The aim is to show that the climate commitment rests on a measurable basis, a defined scope and a traceable plan. Stating a target is easy; showing the calculation behind the target is what sets it apart.

Who Requests It?

  • Companies disclosing a net-zero or reduction target
  • Businesses presenting a climate commitment to investors and lenders
  • Groups within scope of climate reporting
  • Suppliers whose customers request a climate target
  • Brands using a climate claim in advertising and communications

Scope and Boundaries

  • The scope of the claim: which organisational boundaries, which scopes (1, 2, 3)
  • Defining the base year and the target year
  • Clarifying whether the target is absolute or intensity-based
  • The existence of a reduction pathway and interim targets
  • Whether the target is linked to a scientific reference
  • The share of offsetting and removal within the target, shown separately
  • The progress-tracking and reporting mechanism
  • The rules for recalculating the base year
  • The clarity of the claim's wording and whether the scope boundary is conveyed

Related Standards

  • ISO 14068-1
  • ISO 14064-1
  • ISO 14021
  • ISO 14026
  • GHG Protocol

Related Standards

  • ISO 14068-1
  • ISO 14064-1
  • ISO 14021
  • ISO 14026
  • GHG Protocol

Verification Process

  1. 1Defining the ClaimIt is clarified which claim is being made, for which product or organisation and within what scope. A vague claim cannot be verified.
  2. 2Preparation of the Supporting DataThe calculations, measurements or certificate records supporting the claim are prepared by the organisation.
  3. 3Establishing the CriterionThe standard or rule set against which the claim will be assessed is identified — ISO 14068-1 for carbon neutrality, ISO 14021 for self-declared claims.
  4. 4Examination of the Supporting BasisThe calculation method, data quality and assumptions are checked; the scope of the claim is compared with the scope of its supporting basis.
  5. 5Assessment of the Wording of the ClaimThe wording of the claim is examined for whether the limits of its scope are conveyed clearly to the reader. A claim resting on correct data can still mislead if it is badly worded.
  6. 6Verification StatementA statement is issued recording that the basis of the claim has been assessed, and setting out its scope.

Level of Assurance

In claim verification, assurance extends to the examination of the basis of the claim. The verifier does not state that the claim is true, but that the basis presented supports the claim and that the scope is stated correctly. This distinction means no assurance is given for impacts outside the scope of the claim.

Output and Statement

  • Details of the verification body
  • The text of the claim and its scope
  • The product, service or organisation the claim relates to
  • Criteria and standard applied
  • The supporting data examined and the period covered
  • Scope limits and exclusions
  • The verification conclusion and its period of validity

Limits of the Output

Verifying a forward-looking target is not an assurance that the target WILL BE MET. Verification assesses whether the target is defined, measurable and consistent with the available data; it does not commit to the outcome. Verification is also limited to the scope of the claim: it says nothing about emissions or activities excluded from scope. Tracking progress is a separate matter for periodic verification.

Accreditation

Greenhouse gas verification and validation activities are accredited under ISO 14065; the verification itself is performed to ISO 14064-3 and the competence of verification personnel is defined by ISO 14066. Assurance engagements, by contrast, are governed by assurance standards such as ISAE 3000 and do not fall within accredited certification. In both frameworks the impartiality rule is decisive: the party that performs the calculation cannot verify that same calculation. EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation from accreditation bodies that are signatories to the ILAC and IAF mutual recognition arrangements; which verifications can be offered within accredited scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Scope and authorisations

Related Verifications

Frequently Asked Questions

Are net zero and carbon neutral the same thing?

No. Carbon neutrality can be achieved by offsetting residual emissions and can be reached in the short term. Net zero requires deep reduction of emissions along a science-based pathway, with only the unavoidable residual emissions balanced by permanent REMOVAL; net zero cannot be claimed with offset credits.

What is the difference between an absolute target and an intensity target?

An absolute target commits to reducing total emissions, while an intensity target commits to reducing emissions per unit of output or per unit of revenue. In a growing company, total emissions can rise even while the intensity target is met; the claim's wording must therefore clearly state which one is used.

Does a verified claim eliminate greenwashing risk?

Not entirely. Verification shows that the basis of the claim has been examined; but HOW the claim is worded is a separate risk. A claim based on correct data can still be considered misleading if the scope boundary is not conveyed to the reader, or if it creates a general impression of superiority. This is why the wording of the claim itself is also assessed in verification.

We use cookies required for the site to work. With your permission we also add an analytics cookie to understand how pages are used. Cookie Policy