Loading

Medical Device Testing · Medical

Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

ISO 10993-10
Medikal Cihaz Testleri laboratory work

What Is Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10?

The sensitisation assessment examines whether substances released from the device sensitise the immune system, that is, their potential to cause an allergic reaction on repeated contact. The effect appears not on first contact but on re-exposure after sensitisation; the test therefore has two stages.

Purpose of Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

The purpose is to determine the risk of delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients or users in contact with the device. Nickel, latex proteins and certain accelerators are known sources of this risk.

Which Products Is Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10 Applied To?

  • Devices in contact with skin and mucosa
  • Gloves and barrier products
  • Wound dressings and adhesive products
  • Implants and metal alloys
  • Dental materials

In Which Sectors Is Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10 Used?

Medical DevicePharmaceuticalsHealthcareBiotechnology

Standards Related to Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

  • ISO 10993-10skin sensitivity assessment test

Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10 Conditions

Approach
Existing data and chemical characterisation first; testing if needed
Stages
Sensitisation (induction) followed by re-exposure (challenge)
Extraction
Polar and non-polar extracts per ISO 10993-12
Alternative methods
Non-animal methods such as OECD 442C/D/E are assessed first

Equipment for Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

  • Extraction and sample preparation setup
  • In vitro sensitisation test systems (cell lines, plate reader)
  • Analytical chemical characterisation equipment
  • Controlled environment and recording systems

Sample Requirements for Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

  • The specimen must be supplied in its final state, having gone through all series-production processes (including sterilisation).
  • The surface area and mass of the device in patient contact must be provided.
  • Material composition, manufacturing aids and coating information, if any, must be shared.
  • The specimen quantity needed for extraction is calculated from the surface area; this must be confirmed before shipping.
  • Packaging integrity must be maintained for sterile products.

Duration of Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

Because there is a rest period between the induction and challenge stages, the assessment spans several weeks. Duration shortens markedly when the endpoint can be closed by chemical characterisation.

Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10 Procedure

  1. 1The device's material composition and existing biocompatibility data are reviewed.
  2. 2The presence of sensitising substances is investigated through chemical characterisation.
  3. 3If the endpoint cannot be closed with data, a suitable test method is selected.
  4. 4Extracts are prepared per ISO 10993-12.
  5. 5The induction stage is applied.
  6. 6The re-exposure stage is applied after the rest period.
  7. 7Responses are assessed by comparison against the controls.

Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10 Acceptance Criteria

The acceptance criterion is selected from the relevant section of the standard according to the device's contact type (surface, externally communicating, implant), contact duration and intended use. The assessment relies not on a single test result but on the biological evaluation plan carried out under ISO 10993-1; this page therefore gives no fixed limit.

Evaluation of Results

The result is assessed by whether the response at the re-exposure stage differs significantly from the control group. If positive, the responsible component is investigated; a formulation change usually requires the test to be repeated.

Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10 Report

  • Device identification, model and lot number, if any
  • Device contact type, duration and intended use
  • Standard and section applied
  • Extraction or sample preparation conditions
  • Cell line, test system or test rig used
  • Controls and their results
  • Observations, measurement results and assessment
  • A statement that the result applies only to the specimen submitted for testing

Accreditation

EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.

Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Scope and authorisations

Related Regulations

  • EU 2017/745 Medical Device Regulation (MDR)
  • Medical Device Regulation (Türkiye)
  • ISO 14971 (risk management for medical devices)
  • ISO 13485 (medical devices — quality management system)

Medikal Cihaz Testleri — What Does This Testing Field Cover?

The section below describes the field that the Sensitisation test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Medical device testing shows that a device is safe for the patient and the user and maintains its intended performance. In this family safety is not only about avoiding harm; a device failing to perform its expected function is also treated as a risk. A monitor missing an alarm or a pump delivering the wrong dose is directly a patient safety event.

At the centre of the field is RISK MANAGEMENT, and this is what sets medical apart from other sectors. The risk management process run under ISO 14971 also determines which tests are required. The test list is not copied from a table of standards; it is derived and justified from the device's intended use, the nature and duration of patient contact, the use environment and foreseeable misuse.

Assessment consists of several separate bodies of work, each with its own set of standards. Biocompatibility runs through the ISO 10993 series, electrical device safety through the IEC 60601 series, sterilisation through ISO 11135/11137/17665, packaging through ISO 11607, software through IEC 62304 and usability through IEC 62366. The quality system (ISO 13485) is the framework that binds these together.

Which tests are required is determined by the device's CLASS and its MODE OF CONTACT WITH THE BODY. A product in brief contact with skin and an implant entering the bloodstream do not go through the same test set; the scope is set by a biological evaluation plan prepared under ISO 10993-1. That plan justifies in writing which endpoints are required and why the others are not.

Packaging and sterilisation are taken as seriously as the device itself in this field. For a sterile device the packaging is not a transport container but the barrier that maintains sterility; if the barrier is breached, the device is no longer sterile. Packaging processes are therefore validated and shelf life is supported by real-time ageing data.

For devices containing software, assessment shifts from testing towards PROCESS assurance. IEC 62304 defines which development and verification steps must be followed according to the safety class of the software; the evidence is the traceability of the development process. Testing software does not make it safe — the process record does.

The clinical side is a separate column of the technical file. Test reports show that the device is technically safe; clinical evaluation establishes that the device delivers the intended clinical benefit and that the benefit-risk balance is acceptable. Neither replaces the other.

Method groups in this field

  • Biocompatibility

    Cytotoxicity, irritation, skin sensitisation, systemic toxicity, haemocompatibility, genotoxicity and local effects after implantation. The required endpoints are set by the ISO 10993-1 plan.

  • Electrical device safety

    IEC 60601-1 basic safety and essential performance; EMC, alarm, usability and environmental requirements through the collateral standards.

  • Sterilisation validation

    Validation of sterilisation processes by ethylene oxide, radiation or moist heat; bioburden and sterility assurance level studies.

  • Packaging

    Integrity of the sterile barrier system, seal strength, distribution simulation and shelf-life studies.

  • Microbiological tests

    Bioburden determination, sterility testing, bacterial endotoxin and, where required, carrier validation studies.

  • Software and usability

    IEC 62304 life cycle evidence and use-error focused evaluation under IEC 62366.

Commonly confused in this field

  • Cytotoxicity alone is not evidence of biocompatibility; the required set of endpoints is determined and justified according to ISO 10993-1.
  • An ISO 13485 certificate does not confer CE marking; classification under the MDR, the technical file and the notified body process run separately.
  • Accelerated ageing does not replace real-time ageing; a shelf life claim is supported by real-time data.
  • A change of material (supplier, pigment, sterilisation method) may require the biological evaluation to be repeated; it is not a silent change.
  • An assessment made without the collateral and particular standards for IEC 60601-1 is incomplete; which -1-x and -2-x standards were applied must appear in the report.
  • In vitro diagnostic devices fall under the IVDR rather than the MDR, and laboratory equipment is often on the IEC 61010-1 side.

Which decisions these results support

  • MDR/IVDR technical file and notified body assessment
  • Completing the biological evaluation plan
  • Sterilisation and packaging validation
  • Determining shelf life and storage conditions
  • Determining the scope of reassessment after a design change

Related Tests

Frequently Asked Questions About Sensitisation — ISO 10993-10

Can this test be done without using animals?

The MDR and ISO 10993-1 position animal testing as a last resort. Chemical characterisation and OECD's in vitro methods are assessed first, though closing the endpoint with these may not be possible for every device.

How does it differ from irritation?

Irritation is direct, local tissue damage arising on first contact. Sensitisation is immune-mediated and only appears on re-exposure in a person who has already been sensitised.

We use cookies required for the site to work. With your permission we also add an analytics cookie to understand how pages are used. Cookie Policy