Loading

Mechanical Testing · Dynamic Tests

Impact Test

ISO 148-1ISO 179-1ISO 180ASTM E23ASTM D256
Mekanik Testler laboratory work

What Is Impact Test?

The impact test is a test in which the energy absorbed while a specimen is suddenly loaded by a pendulum hammer or falling weight is measured. It shows whether the material behaves in a brittle or ductile manner.

Purpose of Impact Test

The purpose is to determine the material's resistance to impact loads and to assess the risk of brittle fracture, particularly at low temperature.

Which Products Is Impact Test Applied To?

  • Structural steels and welded joints
  • Plastic and composite parts
  • Pipe and pressure-vessel materials
  • Cast parts

In Which Sectors Is Impact Test Used?

MetalSteelMachineryIndustrial EquipmentPlastics

Standards Related to Impact Test

  • ISO 148-1
  • ISO 179-1
  • ISO 180
  • ASTM E23
  • ASTM D256

Impact Test Conditions

Method
Charpy (horizontal, two supports) or Izod (vertical, cantilever)
Notch
V- or U-notch per the material standard; an unnotched option is also defined
Temperature
Room temperature or lower temperature according to specification
Pendulum energy
A capacity suited to the specimen's toughness is chosen

Equipment for Impact Test

  • Pendulum impact test machine
  • Notch-broaching machine
  • Low-temperature bath
  • Temperature measurement system

Sample Requirements for Impact Test

  • Specimen size is prepared per the relevant standard
  • Notch geometry and location must be checked
  • Generally three specimens per set (metal) or five specimens (polymer)
  • Conditioning is mandatory for polymers

Duration of Impact Test

Testing per specimen takes a few minutes. If low-temperature conditioning is required, the total duration extends.

Impact Test Procedure

  1. 1Specimens are prepared to the size and notch defined in the standard.
  2. 2If required, conditioning is performed at the test temperature.
  3. 3The pendulum capacity is selected and the machine is verified.
  4. 4The specimen is placed in the position required by the method.
  5. 5The pendulum is released and the absorbed energy is read.
  6. 6The fracture surface and failure type are recorded.

Impact Test Acceptance Criteria

The acceptance criterion is given in the material or product standard; it is generally defined as a minimum average energy at a specified temperature, with a lower limit for a single specimen.

Evaluation of Results

The set average and individual values are evaluated together. The test is invalid if the specimen did not fracture, or if the result was far below or above the pendulum's capacity.

Impact Test Report

  • Standard and method applied
  • Specimen size, notch type and location
  • Test temperature and pendulum capacity
  • Absorbed energy values and the average
  • Fracture-surface assessment

Accreditation

EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.

Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Scope and authorisations

Related Regulations

  • Structural-steel and pressure-vessel product standards
  • Welding-procedure-qualification requirements

Mekanik Testler — What Does This Testing Field Cover?

The section below describes the field that the Impact Test test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Mechanical testing measures how a material or a part behaves under force. The family ranges from static loading (tension, compression, bending) to time-dependent behaviour (fatigue, creep), and from hardness and wear to fracture toughness.

What these tests have in common is that the result is reported as a MATERIAL PROPERTY. Yield strength or hardness is not a conformity decision; it is numerical data against which the design and the product standard will compare. Mechanical test reports are therefore usually an input to an engineering decision rather than to a product approval — material selection, safety factor, life prediction.

The distinction between static and dynamic behaviour is the key to understanding the field. A part may appear entirely unstressed under a static load yet break under repeated loading; fatigue fracture occurs at stresses well below the yield strength and gives no warning. For rotating, vibrating or cyclically loaded parts, a tensile test alone is therefore not sufficient evidence.

Test conditions determine the result, and this is critical for the readability of the report: specimen geometry, loading rate, temperature, conditioning and the gripping arrangement. The same material gives different values under different conditions. In plastics the rate effect is very pronounced, in metals the temperature effect; in composites the specimen orientation changes the result entirely.

Hardness is the most misused measurement in the field. Because it is fast, close to non-destructive and inexpensive, it is often used in place of strength. Conversion tables from hardness to strength exist, but they are APPROXIMATE and depend on the material group; using them as the sole evidence in material acceptance is wrong.

The fracture mechanics side requires a specific competence. Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate measurements make it possible to calculate how long a cracked structure will last; they are the basis of damage-tolerant design in fields such as pressure equipment, aircraft structures and pipelines.

Method groups in this field

  • Static tests

    Tension, compression, bending, shear and torsion. Yield and tensile strength, elongation and modulus of elasticity are obtained.

  • Impact tests

    Charpy and Izod notch impact; the brittle-to-ductile transition behaviour of the material is determined as a function of temperature.

  • Hardness

    Brinell, Vickers, Rockwell, Shore and micro hardness. Valuable for surface treatment depth and local differences in strength.

  • Fatigue

    Force- and strain-controlled axial fatigue, fatigue in bending; S-N curves and the endurance limit.

  • Creep and stress relaxation

    Behaviour under long-term load at high temperature; decisive for boiler, turbine and pressure equipment materials.

  • Fracture mechanics

    Plane-strain fracture toughness, the J integral, CTOD and fatigue crack growth rate.

  • Wear and friction

    Taber and rotating drum abrasion, coefficient of friction measurements.

Commonly confused in this field

  • Calculating strength from hardness is approximate; it cannot be used as the sole evidence in material acceptance.
  • Adequate static strength does not demonstrate fatigue strength; a cyclically loaded part requires a separate test.
  • If test rate and temperature are not reported, the result cannot be compared — especially for polymers and composites.
  • A test specimen and the actual part may not give the same value; moulding orientation, weld lines and differences in surface treatment all have an effect.
  • A strength value given for a composite without stating the specimen orientation is meaningless.
  • ASTM and ISO counterparts measure the same quantity but use different specimen geometries; the results are not treated as directly equivalent.

Which decisions these results support

  • Design verification and material selection
  • Incoming material control and supplier approval
  • Meeting the mechanical requirements of the product standard
  • Failure analysis, life prediction and damage tolerance calculation
  • Verifying heat treatment and surface treatment processes

Related Tests

Frequently Asked Questions About Impact Test

Are Charpy and Izod results comparable?

Not comparable. Specimen mounting and impact direction differ. Whichever method the specification requires is applied.

We use cookies required for the site to work. With your permission we also add an analytics cookie to understand how pages are used. Cookie Policy